We prepared the joint text together with the Association for Monitoring Equal Rights, Youth LGBTI+ Association, Memory Center, Human Rights Association, Human Rights School, Women’s Human Rights Association, Kaos GL Association, Capacity Building Association (KAGED/IHOP), Mor Çatı Women’s Shelter Foundation, Human Rights Foundation of Turkey, and Turkey Third Sector Foundation.
In our joint statement, we emphasized that freedom of association is not limited only to the right to form or join associations; it also includes the right of individuals not to be forced to join an organization and the right of organizations to operate independently of unlawful interference and to access resources. We also indicated that the General Comment should adopt a broad definition encompassing all forms of association, including temporary, informal, and online structures, without requiring permission or legal entity status.
In the joint opinion, we drew attention to the vital importance of freedom of association in the face of increasing authoritarianism and shrinking civic space globally. We also stated that freedom of association forms an inseparable whole with freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, the right to access information, and the right to participate in public affairs, emphasizing that protecting these rights together is essential for democratic and inclusive societies.
Regarding the section of the draft on states’ obligations, we conveyed our views on the need to recognize the autonomy of civil society organizations, ensure a discrimination-free and safe civic space, and prevent intimidation, stigmatization, and criminalization of organizations. We particularly reminded that relationships human rights defenders establish with national and international mechanisms cannot be grounds for investigation or punishment.
In the joint opinion, we also stated that restrictions on freedom of association should be exceptional, interpreted narrowly, and applied only when legitimate, proportionate, and necessary in a democratic society. We pointed out the serious risks of arbitrary use of justifications such as “national security,” “public order,” and “public morality,” and specifically requested explicit guarantees against interference with organizations working in the field of gender equality and LGBTI+ rights.
We also addressed interventions by non-state actors—including the private sector, digital platforms, funders, and the media—against freedom of association in the statement. Noting that SLAPP lawsuits, digital surveillance, disinformation, and smear campaigns have become tools to silence civil society, we called on states to establish effective protection mechanisms against such violations.
You can find the Turkish version of our submitted statement in the attachment.